The NFL legally banned helmet-to-helmet contact
between 2009-2010. Players that tackle opposing players with helmet-to-helmet
contact are heavily fined in today's game. Multiple offenders that break this
rule are either fined heavily or suspended from their next game. Players fined
for violating this rule include Vontaze Burfict, Tramon Williams, Dashon
Goldson, Donte "Hitner" Whitner, Brandon Meriweather, and the list
goes on. These players received fines ranging from $21,000 to $100,000 and some
of them were suspended as well. The result of this rule has led to zero
tolerance regarding the rule, fewer concussions, and a higher rate of lower
body hits. These lower body hits bring up an interesting question: Would a
player rather have a concussion or a severe lower body injury?
A concussion can be a momentary head injury and, in worst cases, sideline a player for weeks. This injury is a lot easier to bounce back from as opposed to a severe lower body injury like a ACL, MCL, PCL, leg, or foot injury. If a player wants to have a long career in the NFL, he will need a healthy body, but specially a healthy lower body. NFL players have to cut, tackle, block, throw, and make acrobatic catches during games. All of those skills require some strong legs. When a defender is running at full speed, lower body health can become a serious concern because players are being hit in their legs. I am not pleading for the NFL or any level of football to allow helmet to helmet contact, but I think most players rather be hit in the upper body. A concussion can lead to health problems that occur later in a player's life. Let's be honest, these players are not thinking about their long-term health. They want to stay on the field and make as much money as they can.
Concussions and lower body health problems are serious matters at hand. I think if lower body injuries continue to proliferate we could see this rule begin to go away. On the other hand, concussions are not anything to snub our nose at, so we may see the league look to implement a "hitting zone". I do not see this rule beginning anytime soon. The NFL is in a tough situation right now, so it's safe to say there is no explicit answer. So who's really paying for the damages the NFL or the players being fined and injured?
A concussion can be a momentary head injury and, in worst cases, sideline a player for weeks. This injury is a lot easier to bounce back from as opposed to a severe lower body injury like a ACL, MCL, PCL, leg, or foot injury. If a player wants to have a long career in the NFL, he will need a healthy body, but specially a healthy lower body. NFL players have to cut, tackle, block, throw, and make acrobatic catches during games. All of those skills require some strong legs. When a defender is running at full speed, lower body health can become a serious concern because players are being hit in their legs. I am not pleading for the NFL or any level of football to allow helmet to helmet contact, but I think most players rather be hit in the upper body. A concussion can lead to health problems that occur later in a player's life. Let's be honest, these players are not thinking about their long-term health. They want to stay on the field and make as much money as they can.
Concussions and lower body health problems are serious matters at hand. I think if lower body injuries continue to proliferate we could see this rule begin to go away. On the other hand, concussions are not anything to snub our nose at, so we may see the league look to implement a "hitting zone". I do not see this rule beginning anytime soon. The NFL is in a tough situation right now, so it's safe to say there is no explicit answer. So who's really paying for the damages the NFL or the players being fined and injured?